Organizational Plan for the Capstone Project
View RubricDue Date:Apr 05, 2015 23:59:59 Max Points:60
Details:
Students
will create a strategic business plan for their culminating project in
BUS-485. The structure of this assignment is comprehensive and
integrative. It requires synthesis and evaluation of information,
skills, and knowledge developed throughout the BS program at COB.
You
will be required to submit a specific section of the capstone in each
Module of the course as indicated in the assignment directions. Each
section will be due by the end of the Module in which it is assigned.
Review the Capstone Project Assignment Directions for additional
information.
Write the Organizational Plan for your organization
(750-1,000 words). Refer to chapters 4 and 6 in the textbook for
additional information.
- Describe who will comprise your
management team and what talents or skills each of the team members will
bring to the organization. Include a simple organizational chart. - Outline
a McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model (strategy, structure, systems, shared
values, style, staff, skills) as it applies to your business. Review the
McKinsey 7-S Resources in the topic materials for additional
information on completing this section. - Describe your
business-level strategy (chapter 4 – cost leadership or differentiated)
and explain how it fits with the corporate-level strategy (chapter 6 –
low, medium, or high differentiation plus value creating, value neutral,
or value reducing) for your organization.
Prepare this
assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This
assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric
to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric
prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment
criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment
You
are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be
submitted to Turnitin.
Organizational Plan for the Capstone Project
| 70.0 %Content | |||||
| 20.0 %Describe your management team (talents/skills; org chart) | Management team description is either missing or not discernible by the reader. | The management team description is incomplete or the content is inaccurate. | The management team description is complete, although cursory. | The management team description is complete and thorough. | The management team description is complete, thorough, and detailed. |
| 25.0 %Describe a McKinsey 7-S Assessment /Model applicable to your business. | The McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model description is either missing or not discernible by the reader. | The McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model description is incomplete or inaccurate. | The McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model description is complete, although cursory. | The McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model description is complete and thorough. | The McKinsey 7-S Assessment/Model description is complete and insightful. |
| 25.0 %Describe your business-level strategy and explain how it fits with the corporate-level strategy. | The explanation of business-level strategy and explanation of fit with corporate-level strategy is either missing or not discernible by the reader. | The explanation of business-level strategy and explanation of fit with corporate-level strategy is incomplete or inaccurate. | The explanation of business-level strategy and explanation of fit with corporate-level strategy is complete, although cursory. | The explanation of business-level strategy and explanation of fit with corporate-level strategy is complete and thorough. | The explanation of business-level strategy and explanation of fit with corporate-level strategy is complete and insightful. |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | |||||
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| 10.0 %Format | |||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| 5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| 100 %Total | Please follow rubric My company is a rehabilitation center for males and female after the are released from prison. |
