Chegg Writers

support@cheggwriters.com
  • Home
  • Services
    • Assignment Writing Services
      • Essays
      • Term Paper
      • Literature Review
      • Coursework
      • Case Study
      • Capstone Project
      • Speech Writing
    • Dissertation Writing Services
      • Dissertation Proposal
      • Dissertation Writing
      • Dissertation Editing/Proofreading
      • Grant Proposal
    • Report Writing Services
      • Critical Writing
      • Reflective Writing
    • Admission Writing Services
      • Personal Statement
      • Application Essay
      • Scholarship Essay
      • Curriculum Vitae (CV)
      • Other Services
  • How it Works
    • FAQs
  • Testimonials
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
  • Order Now
Place an Order
  • Home
  • blog
  • According to Kring, Johnson, David, and Neale
 

According to Kring, Johnson, David, and Neale

Thursday, 03 August 2017 / Published in Uncategorized

According to Kring, Johnson, David, and Neale

Get An Answer to this Question.

1) According to Kring, Johnson, David, and Neale (2014), “the interaction between a predisposition toward disease–the diathesis–and environmental, or life, disturbances–the stress” accounts for the development of psychopathology (p. 58). If you read about all the paradigms (e.g., genetic, neuroscience, and cognitive behavioral) carefully, each paradigm is alluding to this similar phenomenon. Cite one principle/example from each paradigm that points to the same interactions (i.e., gene-environment, neuroscience-environment, and cognition-environment). Make sure your example is solid and the rationale for your example is well thought-through. Ideas that are different from other students and add to the discussions are most appreciated.

Kring, A. M., Johnson, S., Davison, G. C., Neale, J. M. (2014). Abnormal psychology – DSM-5 update (12th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. (ISBN: 978-1-118-64088-3).

2) Design a Study: Comparing the benefits of Dyadic Group Therapy for Anxiety and Schizophrenia patients

For the last several years Dr. William has been developing and promoting his Dyadic Group Therapy (DGT) for the treatment of individuals with social anxiety. The treatment involves twice-weekly therapy sessions for each patient for 16 weeks. There is one therapist and 4 patients in each group. The first session each week is the Dyadic Therapy Session that involves a meeting of just the therapist and an individual patient (the therapist meets each of the four patients in the group at different times). During the 30-minute Dyadic Therapy Session the patient answers a scripted set of questions posed by the therapist (the topics shift each week according to a specific order that is detailed in the DGT Handbook). The second session each week is the Group Therapy Session that involves a meeting of the therapist and all four patients in that group. During the 90 minute Group Therapy Session the patients take turns answering the same questions that they answered in the Dyadic Therapy Session. The idea is that during the Group Therapy Sessions patients will be familiar with the questions and the therapist, and can concentrate on getting used to talking in front of and with other people.

Last month, Dr. William learned that two of his colleagues (who practice together) were using DGT to treat patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate schizophrenia. Their idea is that the Dyadic Therapy Session provides “social skills practice” that will then be applied during the Group Therapy Session. They have conducted some research with their patients and claim that the DGT therapy is beneficial.

Dr. William’s question now is whether DGT works better for patients with one of these diagnoses versus the other? Specifically, his hypothesis is that patients being treated for Anxiety using DGT will produce higher scores on the General Psychiatric Wellness Index (GPWI) than patients being treated for schizophrenia using DGT.

question.jpg Please design an empirical test of Dr. William research hypothesis. Dr. William has arranged the cooperation of his clinic and that of his colleagues’. As a researcher, you have access to their patients. They will deliver the DGT treatment using the standardized procedure to the patients you indicate. They will have the GPWI administered and scored by an independent testing service on the date(s) that you specify. Propose a research design to answer this question. Provide details of participant selection, assignment, treatment provision, controls to provide internal validity, and how the decisions might influence external validity (don’t worry about measurement or statistical conclusion validity for this exercise). Details and specifics are the goal — use correct terminology and procedural names as much as possible.

Kring, A. M., Johnson, S., Davison, G. C., Neale, J. M. (2014). Abnormal psychology – DSM-5 update (12th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. (ISBN: 978-1-118-64088-3).

Place an Order Now

What you can read next

M4D1 English
I have 5 stories and films in the attachments need to answer for each of the 5 :
Are all solids able to conduct electric

 Why Us

 Money-Back Guarantee 


 Plagiarism-free papers


 Affordable Prices and Discounts


 High Quality Papers


 FREE Revisions


 Professional Writers


 24/7 Support Team

We Accept these Payments

 Format and Free Features

 Approx. 275 words / page


 All paper formats (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian)


 Font: 12 point Arial/Times New Roman


 Double and single spacing


 FREE bibliography page


 FREE title page


 Progressive Delivery

Secure and Confidential

Trusted

NEED HELP WRITING YOUR PAPER?

PLACE AN ORDER WITH US TODAY AND ENJOY A 10% DISCOUNT. USE DISCOUNT CODE: Disc10

Place an Order

CHEGG WRITERS

Our Company


About us 

Contact Us

Our Testimonials

How it Works

Faqs

Tools


Free Plagiarism Checker

Writing Style Guides

Bibliography Generator

Place an Order

Our Services 


Assignment Help & Services

Dissertation Writing Services

Report Writing Services

Admission Writing Services

Formatting/Editing/Proofreading

Payment Methods


Custom Writing Services

ARTS


Architecture
Art history
Aviation
Drama
Classic English literature
Culture
Film studies
Literature
Music
Philosophy
Poetry
Religious studies
Shakespeare studies
Theater studies
World literature

 

SOCIAL


Civics
Cognitive Science
Criminology
Education
Family and consumer science
Health
Journalism
Psychology
Sociology

LANGUAGES


English

ECONOMIC & FINANCE


Economics
Finance

HISTORY & POLITICS 


Political science
World affairs

LAW


Criminal Law
Business Law

HUMAN & NATURE


Anthropology
Archaeology
Astronomy
Biochemistry
Biology
Botany
Chemistry
Ecology
Environmental studies
Genetics
Geography
Medicine
Nursing
Physics
Urban Studies

 

COMPANY INFO

Live Chat 24/7 Availability

+1 (631) 573-5413

support@cheggwriters.com

DMCA.com Protection Status

© 2008— 2017 Chegg Writers. All Rights Reserved.

Attention!
Using services provided by Cheggwriters.com is LEGAL and IS NOT prohibited.

You are allowed to use the custom written papers we provide in the following ways:

  1. Get a better understanding of the topic or coursework
  2. Help you do your own research (if properly referenced)
  3. As a sample and guide for your research (see your school's definition of plagiarism)
  4. For referencing purposes (if referenced properly)
Thank you for choosing our service.

Disclaimer

Chegg Writers: Provides custom writing services including dissertations, research papers, article writing, term papers, coursework, blog content, and other content for research assistance purposes. Ensure you include proper reference for these material.

Cookie Policy

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to browse and use Chegg Writers, you give consent for cookies to be used. We value your privacy and do not close anything to third parties. Thank you for choosing us.

TOP